Plagiarism
Detection and Prevention
The definition of plagiarism according to Webster II New
Riverside Office Edition is “to take and use as one’s own the ideas or writings
of another” (Webster\'s II new, 2009). Basically, this means that plagiarism means
stealing someone else’s work and then lying about it later.
Since more and more universities and colleges are
offering online learning and distance learning courses, it has become essential
for instructors and students to understand and protect themselves against
plagiarism.
It is vital for instructors to be aware of the characters of
plagiarism in order to be proactive in preventing it from happening.
What is Plagiarism: (CCC Library, 2010)
There are many different plagiarism detection tools
available for instructors to prevent plagiarism within the online/distance
learning environment. By developing an
understanding of various plagiarism detection software tools, it will allow the
instructor to determine which one will work better within their online/
distance learning environment.
Some examples of plagiarism detection software include:
Professional, student, and newbie, can equally benefit
from it Dupli Checker. Upload essays, thesis, research papers and other written assignments , and get the analysis
report within seconds.
iThenticate: http://www.ithenticate.com/
iThenticate's offers writers, researchers and editors
insight into plagiarism issues across different industries, and guidance for
avoiding plagiarism within various roles and environments. Unfortunately, this is not a free
service.
Turnitin: http://turnitin.com/
This website ensures that submitted work is original by checking submitted papers
against 24+ billion web pages, 300+ million student papers and leading library
databases and publications.
How can the design of my assessments help
prevent academic dishonesty?
In designing assessments there is no single approach that
will deter plagiarism, but various strategies that can be adopted and
reinforced. Assessments should be designed with the student in mind but also
assessments should be aligned with the course goals and outcomes.
Assessments plans generally have at least four types of
experiences important to evaluation for example:
- · Participation in discussion post
- · Automated low stakes quizzes
- · Individual projects that include analysis such as critical thinking and communication of that work to others in a final product of some type, such as a paper, interview, report, podcast, or presentation.
- · Team projects of various sizes and purposes (Boettcher & Conrad, 2010).
It is important for instructors to give clear instructions and guidelines concerning course assignments so there is less room for students to copy and paste from other
sources.
What facilitation strategies do you propose
to use as a current or future online instructor?
In the future, I plan on allowing my students to submit
written assignments early to check their progress. I feel that if the student
feels that their work is going to be checked for plagiarism throughout the
course at different points, they will be less inclined to plagiarize and cite
all of their sources. This will also give the student the ability to edit their assignments as the course progresses to ensure that their activities reflect their
actual
knowledge.
What additional considerations for teaching
should be made to help detect or prevent cheating and plagiarism?
It is very important that clear guidelines and
consequences for plagiarism be given early in the course and stated in the
course syllabus. If a student is suspected of plagiarism they should be
confronted with direct and specific details from the assignment that was
detected as plagiarized. Many institutions have student handbooks that will allow the instructor to follow the standard rules and regulations of the institution.
Boettcher, J., & Conrad ,
R. (2010). The online teaching survival guide. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
CCC Library. (2010). Plagiarism [Video]. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw6NxvwP41U
(2009). Webster's II new riverside dictionary. (Revised ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.